Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '22 at 22:16
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 58
1-Core 62.8
2-Core 82.3
43% 67.7 Pts
4-Core 96.4
8-Core 91.5
13% 93.9 Pts
64-Core 92.7
6% 92.7 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 53.6
Parallax 83.2
53% 67.4 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 44.8
45% 56.1 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$53
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 224 269 240 140 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 326
Write 313
Mixed 274
SusWrite 193
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 33.5
115% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 41.4
DQ Write 80
DQ Mixed 50.5
41% 57.3 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 130%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
807GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 193 197 190 120 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 168
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 160
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.9% Poor
MC Read 12
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10.9
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-HD2 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2 - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback