Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '22 at 19:01
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 613
61% 495 Pts
64-Core 784
48% 784 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49% Average
Lighting 59.3
Reflection 71
Parallax 62.7
48% 64.3 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 61.8
Splatting 56.6
50% 62.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 428
Write 238
Mixed 302
71% 323 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 33.4
109% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 343
256% 342 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905598-009.A00G 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.5% Good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 22
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 22.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-UD4-CF Builds (Compare 837 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback