Today's hottest deals

Asus X540NA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X540NA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X540NA
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200928
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 01 '22 at 00:05
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
21.3% Poor
Memory 28.7
1-Core 43.9
2-Core 84.5
29% 52.4 Pts
4-Core 81.6
8-Core 82.5
11% 82.1 Pts
64-Core 80.7
5% 80.7 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Asus(1043 1DE0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 2.2
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
739GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 81 27 24 54 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 82.7
Write 122
Mixed 54
SusWrite 48.3
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 71%
SDHC Card 4GB
4GB free, PID null,
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 0.6 1.3 4.3 4.4 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 3.3
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 2.8
6% 6.27 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 263
15% 263 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X540NA Builds (Compare 203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X540NA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback