Today's hottest deals

HP Mini 311-1000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Mini 311-1000  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3651
Memory1.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101126
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 21 '17 at 09:58
Run Duration477 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N280
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
24.6% Poor
Memory 47.8
1-Core 7.2
2-Core 11.9
19% 22.3 Pts
4-Core 11.7
8-Core 11.8
2% 11.8 Pts
64-Core 11.9
1% 11.9 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia ION LE
HP(103C 3651) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.95
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 2.08
Parallax 0.34
1% 1.14 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545016B9A 160GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PBBO
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 45.7
Write 40.6
Mixed 45.3
33% 43.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.23
53% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 34%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 6.61
Mixed 8.15
15% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.33
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.86
93% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT112S6AFR8C-G7 Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8 3GB
1066, 1066 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.04% Terrible
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 2.6
7% 2.5 GB/s
SC Read 0.6
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 1.3
4% 1.33 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Mini 311-1000 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 10%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: HP Mini 311-1000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback