Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics25% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130503
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 10:43
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 215
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 527
60% 467 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
PNY(196E 1000) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25% Poor
Lighting 28.6
Reflection 46.8
Parallax 40.7
23% 38.7 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 30.5
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$53
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 308 288 279 275 277 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 464
Write 311
Mixed 293
SusWrite 278
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 32.9
114% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 270
226% 327 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 130%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$52
273GB free
Firmware: 0003HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 91 90 90 92 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 84.2
Write 55.3
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 88.9
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.2
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 66.1
61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $192
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback