Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive296% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211229
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '22 at 09:43
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 153
2-Core 301
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 609
8-Core 937
96% 773 Pts
64-Core 1,115
69% 1,115 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33% Below average
Lighting 43.2
Reflection 42
Parallax 39.8
35% 41.7 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 42.4
Splatting 27.9
29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXH7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2219 636 690 1129 273 276 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 2,404
Write 2,208
Mixed 1587
SusWrite 870
395% 1,767 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 94.4
322% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,007
DQ Write 1,097
DQ Mixed 1,166
846% 1,090 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 296%
Great: 279%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
4GB free
Firmware: CC64
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 84.3
Write 60.4
Mixed 70.1
54% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$63
432GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 154 156 157 156 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 151
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 156
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
243% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 108%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
11GB free, PID a20b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 10.8
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 13
18% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
34% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 36.3
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 28.4
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 38.3
88% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $1,183
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback