Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180212
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '22 at 09:36
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 192
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 426
57% 426 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver:
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 46.4
30% 40.2 fps
MRender 30.6
Gravity 32.1
Splatting 25
24% 29.2 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 29%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$47
895GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 104 112 92 77 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 131
Write 139
Mixed 32
SusWrite 99.7
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.2% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M Pro4 Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $254
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback