Today's hottest deals

Asus KGP(M)E-D16

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAsus KGP(M)E-D16  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK KGP(M)E-D16
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160616
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '17 at 23:01
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6128
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Memory 40.2
1-Core 12.2
2-Core 40.9
21% 31.1 Pts
4-Core 52.4
8-Core 178
12% 115 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 83F8) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.2% Poor
Lighting 19.5
Reflection 19.4
Parallax 44.9
16% 27.9 fps
MRender 46.5
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 33.4
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 2X2 Mirror/RAID1 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 210
Write 185
Mixed 163
140% 186 MB/s
4K Read 1.04
4K Write 3.72
4K Mixed 0.95
218% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 114%
Great: 251%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 124GB
88GB free, PID db8a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 23.2
Write 22.9
Mixed 20.8
29% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.36
4K Write 0.77
4K Mixed 0.6
55% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
20.3% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.7
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KGP(M)E-D16 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus KGP(M)E-D16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $503
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback