Today's hottest deals

Amazon g5.xlarge

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics177% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 14 months ago.
SystemAmazon g5.xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '22 at 17:16
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7R32
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 193
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 280
38% 281 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia A10G
Nvidia(10DE 152F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1710 MHz, MLim: 3125 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
177% Outstanding
Lighting 256
Reflection 248
Parallax 290
208% 265 fps
MRender 244
Gravity 234
Splatting 166
171% 215 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 177%
Great: 193%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon EC2 NVMe 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: 0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 155 155 155 155 155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 594
Write 259
Mixed 576
SusWrite 159
88% 397 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 51.2
168% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 176
141% 201 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 96%
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 32GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 136
Write 184
Mixed 142
116% 154 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 7.2
1,350% 7.83 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 39.6
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 32
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical g5.xlarge Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

System: Amazon g5.xlarge

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback