Today's hottest deals

Asus K73BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus K73BR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K73BR
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111121
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '22 at 16:10
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Memory 51.8
1-Core 16.9
2-Core 30.1
24% 32.9 Pts
4-Core 32.1
8-Core 31.1
4% 31.6 Pts
64-Core 31.8
2% 31.8 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7400M
Asus(1043 2109) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.9 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 45 55 56 56 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 300
Write 272
Mixed 244
SusWrite 52.6
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 20.7
4K Mixed 9.5
40% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 22.8
DQ Write 45
DQ Mixed 15.7
17% 27.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$17
192GB free
Firmware: 12.01A12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 45 54 55 55 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 58
Write 55.3
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 51.7
38% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.67 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K73BR Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K73BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $24
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback