Today's hottest deals

Acer Veriton M480

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Veriton M480  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M480
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '22 at 17:43
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 44.8
2-Core 89.7
46% 70.7 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 178
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 833F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.28% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.63 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 1
Splatting 3.4
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.28%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 62 52 14 34 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 58.7
Write 58
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 44.9
36% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2GB
1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
20.4% Poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 5.6
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M480 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M480

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $216
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback