Today's hottest deals

Asrock B365 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B365 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '22 at 03:20
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$148
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 222
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 416
55% 414 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.9% Average
Lighting 59.4
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 77.3
48% 68.2 fps
MRender 58.2
Gravity 54.4
Splatting 41.2
41% 51.3 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 396 294 270 271 253 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 461
Write 426
Mixed 408
SusWrite 312
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 27.2
89% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 157
133% 200 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 132%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
259GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 181 187 187 187 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 128
Write 165
Mixed 113
SusWrite 182
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.7
311% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 97%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
94GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 56 55 57 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 37.8
Write 36.7
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 56
30% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
930GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 106 98 105 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 74.9
Write 74.3
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 105
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
191% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52%
Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
15GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 105 103 106 107 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 118
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 106
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.7
179% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 66%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
214GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 41 41 41 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 34.8
Write 41
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 40.9
28% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.5
165% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
27GB free
Firmware: 9300
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 126
Write 133
Mixed 75.6
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2A2666C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
73% Very good
MC Read 25
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 24.3
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 22.2
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B365 Pro4 Builds (Compare 2,421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365 Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback