Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '22 at 03:59
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3940XM-$344
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 74
2-Core 138
55% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 203
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3000M
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
7.91% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 11.2
7% 10.9 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 10.6
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.91%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 303 308 296 303 301 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 448
Mixed 429
SusWrite 305
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 41
135% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 365
275% 368 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96%
Great: 128%
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: EMT03L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 298 299 298 299 297 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 445
Write 300
Mixed 269
SusWrite 298
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 31.6
102% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 244
210% 312 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B1G73EB0-YK0 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.1
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.6
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 40 17.2" 1280 720 AUO219D
Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 574 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback