Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire G7750

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire G7750  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire G7750
Memory7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '22 at 17:05
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 81.6
2-Core 158
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 406
42% 338 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 190
Parallax 179
138% 179 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 173
Splatting 126
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 224 227 232 217 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.1% Good
Read 245
Write 234
Mixed 230
SusWrite 190
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 38.6
112% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 180
140% 192 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 126%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$29
569GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 92 95 93 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 90.2
Write 96.2
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 92.8
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 61%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
12GB free, PID 0716
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 26.2
Write 18.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 18.5
22% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2.6
190% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 17%
Philips USB Flash Drive 8GB
7GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 3.1 5.3 4 4.5 4.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 0.2
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 3.8
7% 6.75 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x1GB
6 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 11.7
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire G7750 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire G7750

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $344
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback