Today's hottest deals

Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X399 Professional Gaming  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime5 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '22 at 07:45
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$334
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 224
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 834
77% 643 Pts
64-Core 2,178
135% 2,178 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 187
Parallax 181
145% 182 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 186
Splatting 122
119% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$265
770GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,452
Write 2,112
Mixed 1,366
438% 1,977 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 67.4
223% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 847
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 719
526% 695 MB/s
Poor: 215% Great: 425%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$239
3TB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,610
Write 2,868
Mixed 2,291
648% 2,923 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 67.4
215% 74.7 MB/s
DQ Read 858
DQ Write 540
DQ Mixed 754
547% 717 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 371%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3333 C16 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 22.5
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $836
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $152Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback