Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire E1-571

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-571  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HC_CR
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '22 at 00:20
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 79.8
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 151
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 207
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 064B) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.87 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 374 402 384 386 391 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 442
Write 397
Mixed 335
SusWrite 387
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 10.9
70% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 17.3
71% 155 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HB3SU002GFM8MMD33 SH564568FJ8NZRNSDR 4GB
1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.7% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-571 Builds (Compare 689 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-571

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback