Today's hottest deals

Dell Studio XPS 8000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Studio XPS 8000  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0X231R
Memory0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090811
Uptime2 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '22 at 10:20
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$265
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 127
60% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 325
33% 266 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 130
Sapphire(174B 9420) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 341.95
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.46% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 0.7
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.9
2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.46%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3500102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 224
Write 202
Mixed 173
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 13.8
60% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 20.1
DQ Write 23.5
DQ Mixed 10.6
11% 18.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
450GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 10 113 70 14 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 107
Write 88.3
Mixed 64
SusWrite 48.5
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
20.7% Poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 5.2
17% 5.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 5.4
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 8000 Builds (Compare 192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 8000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $312
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback