Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Motherboard
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '22 at 21:01
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Memory 27.3
1-Core 31.4
2-Core 54.2
22% 37.6 Pts
4-Core 67.8
8-Core 58.9
9% 63.4 Pts
64-Core 57.7
4% 57.7 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Device(1297 2000)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.16% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.1
0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.16%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$34
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 89 64 69 50 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 73.6
Write 75.8
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 64.5
47% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 61%
WD 5000LPC External 500GB
353GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9.1 9 9 9.1 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Read 9.4
Write 8.8
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 9
12% 8.88 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3020EC58E9F1333 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.41% Terrible
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.23 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.7
6% 2.13 GB/s
Latency 271
15% 271 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.41%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,908 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback