Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_K571GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_K571GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X571GT
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201217
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '22 at 13:39
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 221
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 527
58% 455 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1A81) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.34% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 48.8
Parallax 6.7
5% 20.6 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 8.9
6% 6.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.34%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$67
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 737 577 331 96 116 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,000
Write 889
Mixed 773
SusWrite 325
167% 747 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 62.8
220% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 622
DQ Mixed 214
235% 383 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 149%
Great: 209%
Lenovo USB Hard Drive 1TB
500GB free, PID 4533
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 42 37 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.72% Terrible
Read 5.2
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 39.7
21% 14 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.72%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
38.3% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 10.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_K571GT Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_K571GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $67
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback