Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 745 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 745 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 807E
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201017
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '22 at 20:28
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A10-8700B R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
U4500, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20% Very poor
Memory 21.5
1-Core 44.8
2-Core 78.3
26% 48.2 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 102
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
HP(103C 807E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.09.04.01
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
2.43% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 4.1
2% 3.6 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 3
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.43%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 82 85 82 81 81 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.6% Below average
Read 217
Write 247
Mixed 206
SusWrite 87.1
43% 189 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 13.9
44% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 95.3
DQ Mixed 149
117% 165 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
428GB free
Firmware: GH2OA440
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 127 124 129 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 27.5
Write 118
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 128
56% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273EBO-YKO 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 15.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8.8
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 309
13% 309 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 745 G3 Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 745 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback