Today's hottest deals

Asus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF_6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF_6  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF_6
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150709
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 05:47
Run Duration314 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 66.1
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 112
48% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 172
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.7% Above average
Lighting 61.4
Reflection 64.3
Parallax 59.7
50% 61.8 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 65.1
Splatting 60.6
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102HD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 18 43 24 50 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 241
Write 55.2
Mixed 92.8
SusWrite 34.1
23% 106 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 8.4
60% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.2
DQ Write 26.7
DQ Mixed 11
12% 19.6 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 44%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 148 146 161 164 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 160
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 156
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.5
138% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
115GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.1 6.1 5.9 6.1 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 32
Write 34
Mixed 31
SusWrite 6.1
19% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
238% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 89%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
700GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.2 6.2 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 30.5
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 6.2
18% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.4
170% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11%
Great: 98%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
862GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.2 6.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.08% Terrible
Read 20.2
Write 31.8
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 6.2
17% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
217% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 8.08%
Great: 98%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
447GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.2 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 35
Write 32.5
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 6.2
18% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12%
Great: 104%
Seagate Expansion HDD 14TB
9TB free
Firmware: 1801
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.3 6.2 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 33.8
Mixed 31
SusWrite 6.3
20% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 1.3
524% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 131%
Generic External 750GB
25GB free, PID 3920
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 28 30 30 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 12.3
Write 19.3
Mixed 16
SusWrite 29
28% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 41%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 500GB
123GB free, PID 5021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 32 33 35 35 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 24.2
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 33.8
38% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 31%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
946GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 25.8
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 5.6
27% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.3
198% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 19%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 M378B5173EB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.4% Poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 10.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF_6 Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF_6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback