Today's hottest deals

Packard imedia S3800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemPackard imedia S3800  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard FIH57
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20100120
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateJan 31 '22 at 09:50
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3470
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 125
63% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 382
41% 328 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.42% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 2.6
5% 3.57 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 5
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.42%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
572GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 87 87 99 99 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 107
Write 107
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 94.8
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Toshiba ACR256X64D3U1333C9 ACR128X64D3U1333C9 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 ACR128X64D3U1333C9 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.6
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 12.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical imedia S3800 Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S3800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback