Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81XA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 81XA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '22 at 03:54
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 148
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 270
30% 234 Pts
64-Core 314
20% 314 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F17) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 5.5
4% 4.93 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 8.9
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPITJ512PED2OWX 512GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFR12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 536 495 593 472 511 271 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 824
Write 902
Mixed 727
SusWrite 480
165% 733 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 35.3
130% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 368
239% 280 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 113%
Great: 218%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.5% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 18.5
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 20.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81XA Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81XA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback