PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds) |
Memory | 14.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210108 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 28 '22 at 23:30 |
Run Duration | 181 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
69.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Nvidia(10DE 105F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
|
15.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 49 61 65 48 60 MB/s
|
49.6%
Average
|
|||
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
442GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 24 22 25 26 MB/s
|
16.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 36JSZF51272PZ 36JSZF51272PZ 36JSZF51272PZ 36JSZF51272PY 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 117x |
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 63x |
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples | 37x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 35x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 31x |
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples | 27x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $90 |