Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '22 at 19:41
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 121
56% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 275
31% 244 Pts
64-Core 249
15% 249 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.1% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 74.6
Parallax 67.8
56% 70.5 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 71.4
Splatting 68.4
56% 67.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721032SLA380 320GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST2OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 14 23 53 49 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 48
Mixed 37
SusWrite 32
27% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.1
58% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 58%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
486GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 87 87 88 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 9.5
Write 16.4
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 86.5
23% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 59%
SABRENT 480GB
443GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 238 247 254 259 260 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 161
Mixed 164
SusWrite 247
260% 189 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 7.3
806% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 18.1
DQ Write 32.1
DQ Mixed 13.4
1,615% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 130%
Great: 238%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston 9905458-010.A00LF CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston 9905458-010.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.2% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $467
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback