Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81D7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81D7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '22 at 17:10
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
22.6% Poor
Memory 32.7
1-Core 33.3
2-Core 93.9
29% 53.3 Pts
4-Core 73.3
8-Core 71.2
10% 72.2 Pts
64-Core 82.9
5% 82.9 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 39F3) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
3.61% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 5.9
3% 5.2 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 6.1
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.61%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G32TNF-N3A0A 256GB
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 204 237 253 245 237 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 314
Write 235
Mixed 257
SusWrite 229
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 19.2
71% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 176
143% 201 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.3% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 8.4
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 239
17% 239 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81D7 Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81D7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback