Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 153%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '22 at 19:48
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 80.3
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 1,016
92% 774 Pts
64-Core 2,205
136% 2,205 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$430
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 202
Reflection 245
Parallax 174
165% 207 fps
MRender 260
Gravity 163
Splatting 132
145% 185 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 147%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 677
Write 982
Mixed 1,040
203% 900 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 63.9
225% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,303
DQ Write 876
DQ Mixed 380
475% 853 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 291%
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
224GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 210 207 218 215 227 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 356
Write 218
Mixed 249
SusWrite 229
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 41.8
147% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 214
186% 273 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 100%
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
48GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 398 402 407 324 239 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 483
Mixed 384
SusWrite 357
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 51.6
180% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 292
238% 338 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 114%
Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
101GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 126 127 126 128 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 145
Write 130
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 125
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 105%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$13
465GB free
Firmware: 0001LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 101 101 102 101 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 98.4
Write 92.7
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 100
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 61%
Hitachi HUS724030ALA640 3TB
58GB free
Firmware: MF8OAC50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 91 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 82.2
Write 85.3
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 90.4
56% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 158 158 156 154 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 90.9
Write 122
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 154
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 90%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
11GB free, PID 0743
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 12 13 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 90.5
Write 9.2
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 11.7
30% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.9
61% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD4AGU880-36A180U 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 49
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 42.9
129% 45.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 40
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 120%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 14,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $896
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback