Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110302
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 11 '17 at 16:11
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 54.9
2-Core 104
49% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 280
32% 247 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
MSI(1462 3030) 2GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 42.4
28% 36 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 29.3
Splatting 36.4
26% 31.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 482
Write 331
Mixed 338
85% 384 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 20.7
103% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 90.8
DQ Mixed 50.9
59% 104 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB
780GB free
Firmware: JC4OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 104
Write 97.4
Mixed 91.5
73% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 0.17
4K Mixed 0.12
21% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 64%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
56GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 64.8
Write 62
Mixed 56.4
46% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.01
4K Write 0.36
4K Mixed 0.31
42% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX DDR3 1600 C9 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25.3% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,068 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $182

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $801
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback