Today's hottest deals

Acer, Aspire 1650

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory0GB is not enough RAM for Windows XP. This system needs at least 0.25GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows XP is considerably out of date. This system should be upgraded to at least Windows 8.1. (Note: a minimum of of 1GB of RAM is recommended for Windows 7, 8.1 and 10)
SystemAcer, Aspire 1650  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer, Crane II
Memory1.4 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows XP
BIOS Date20050831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '15 at 14:23
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium M processor 1.73GHz-$29
U1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 20.5
2-Core 19.8
10% 20.1 Pts
4-Core 19.9
8-Core 20.8
3% 20.3 Pts
64-Core 20.9
1% 20.9 Pts
Poor: 15% Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI MOBILITY RADEON X300
Acer(1025 0066) 64MB
Driver: ati2dvag.dll Ver. 6.14.10.6543
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.23
Reflection 0.27
0% 0.25 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800UE-22HCT0 80GB
33GB free (System drive)
Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 29
Write 29.5
Mixed 15.6
18% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.27
4K Write 0.41
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 0.26 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 17%
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback