Today's hottest deals

Asus CM1831

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus CM1831  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM1831
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120406
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 13 '22 at 02:09
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 54.1
2-Core 95.6
43% 70.2 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 182
22% 169 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$155
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Lighting 29.1
Reflection 37.4
Parallax 28.5
24% 31.7 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 22.9
20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 34 60 61 46 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 112
Write 135
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 56.6
67% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 106%
Seagate Backup+ Desktop 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: D702
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 27 27 26 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 25
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 26.2
19% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
36.6% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 11.2
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM1831 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM1831

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $164
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback