Today's hottest deals

Intel X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemIntel X64
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200923
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateJan 10 '22 at 05:46
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 95
48% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 271
26% 214 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Gigabyte(1458 353E) 2GB
CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.05% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 8
Parallax 9.6
7% 8.63 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 11
Splatting 8.7
8% 9.33 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.05%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 89 96 89 99 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 112
Write 100
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 90.8
68% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSZF51272PY 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.1
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 2,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback