Today's hottest deals

GAME SLAYER XL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive344% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemGAME SLAYER XL  (all builds)
MotherboardGAME SLAYER XL
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJan 08 '22 at 14:06
Run Duration370 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 72.6
1-Core 161
2-Core 318
97% 184 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 1,004
89% 755 Pts
64-Core 1,277
79% 1,277 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12E9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
8.75% Terrible
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 122
Parallax 11.8
8% 47.9 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 14.1
Splatting 10.3
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.75%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$109
821GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1916 1952 2117 2035 1999 1832 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 2,045
Write 1,982
Mixed 1,871
SusWrite 1,975
444% 1,968 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 89.4
264% 99.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,472
DQ Write 1147
DQ Mixed 1,264
958% 1,294 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 344%
Great: 410%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
14GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 68.8
Write 1.3
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 0.4
14% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 34.6
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 44.4
SC Mixed 20.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SLAYER XL Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: GAME SLAYER XL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback