Today's hottest deals

ACER Aspire M1640

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemACER Aspire M1640  (all builds)
MotherboardACER MCP73
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '22 at 10:30
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110
SOCKET775 M/B, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 43.1
1-Core 42.5
2-Core 85.2
34% 56.9 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 166
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450
XFX(1682 3200) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 2
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB
762GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 101 101 104 104 105 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.6% Average
Read 126
Write 73.5
Mixed 105
SusWrite 102
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 28.9
93% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33.1
DQ Write 61.9
DQ Mixed 41.4
33% 45.5 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 3.2
11% 3.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 3.7
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M1640 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: ACER Aspire M1640

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback