Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79SI
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '22 at 01:47
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3960X-$265
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 161
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 491
48% 393 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 123
Reflection 226
Parallax 136
100% 162 fps
Gravity 127
Splatting 112
105% 119 fps
Poor: 93% Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 378 359 382 389 385 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 438
Write 384
Mixed 279
SusWrite 379
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 30.5
110% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 219
195% 294 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 101%
Kingmax 480GB 480GB
105GB free
Firmware: .4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 437 430 440 442 434 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 454
Mixed 446
SusWrite 439
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 37.4
129% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 316
228% 293 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 117 120 119 115 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 110
Write 124
Mixed 80.1
SusWrite 113
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.3
200% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x393955353437312D3034302E4130304C46 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
26.1% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 7.6
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,908 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback