Today's hottest deals

Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 03:06
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G-$62
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 160
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 283
37% 279 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1420 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 26.4
16% 25.5 fps
MRender 27.1
Gravity 19.4
Splatting 28.9
21% 25.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-minder(s) 120G 120GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08921
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 410 418 409 194 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 458
Mixed 405
SusWrite 317
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 39.9
141% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 244
178% 227 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 98%
3 240GB SSD 240GB
40GB free
Firmware: T0311A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 69 88 53 58 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 456
Write 421
Mixed 377
SusWrite 88.6
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 30.1
136% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 1.5
59% 137 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Golden Empire CL16-18-18 D4-3000 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3266 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.4% Above average
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 17
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $291
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback