Today's hottest deals

Asus CM1745

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus CM1745  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM1745
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '22 at 17:17
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.2% Below average
Memory 49.2
1-Core 38.6
2-Core 59.1
32% 49 Pts
4-Core 86.4
8-Core 106
12% 96.2 Pts
64-Core 86.1
5% 86.1 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Asus(1043 8526) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
4.03% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 4.7
4% 5.87 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 4
Splatting 7.1
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.03%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 260 260 253 260 252 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 354
Write 345
Mixed 367
SusWrite 257
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 31.8
109% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 178
144% 203 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 10.8
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 7.4
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM1745 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM1745

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback