Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200918
Uptime20 Days
Run DateJan 04 '22 at 12:50
Run Duration359 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$486
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 70.5
1-Core 152
2-Core 301
92% 174 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 1,145
101% 860 Pts
64-Core 2,976
184% 2,976 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.2 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,971
Write 2,504
Mixed 2,335
579% 2,603 MB/s
4K Read 80.4
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 110
364% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1279
DQ Write 978
DQ Mixed 1,088
825% 1,115 MB/s
Poor: 176% Great: 377%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
36GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 301 300 300 300 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 468
Mixed 415
SusWrite 319
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 59.2
202% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 277
222% 310 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
WD WD50EZRZ-32RWYB1 5TB
865GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 130 131 132 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 130
Write 129
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 131
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75%
Great: 94%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
486GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 108 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 109
Write 114
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 106
73% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 101%
Jmicron H/W RAID0 36TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 236 234 240 237 234 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
136% Outstanding
Read 238
Write 199
Mixed 99
SusWrite 235
140% 193 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.2
411% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 136%
Great: 136%
Jmicron H/W RAID0 36TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 240 239 244 242 244 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
139% Outstanding
Read 238
Write 197
Mixed 101
SusWrite 241
142% 194 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
758% 6.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 139%
Great: 136%
Jmicron H/W RAID0 40TB
10TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 123 128 125 121 124 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.5% Outstanding
Read 215
Write 210
Mixed 185
SusWrite 124
137% 184 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1
674% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 99%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 10TB
2TB free, PID 25f6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.7% Very poor
Read 36.4
Write 32.1
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 37.3
45% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
44% 0.93 MB/s
WD My Book Duo 25F6 10TB
5.5TB free, PID 25f6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 109 120 119 123 138 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.3% Very good
Read 300
Write 204
Mixed 106
SusWrite 121
223% 183 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
39% 0.8 MB/s
WD My Book Duo 25F6 12TB
1.5TB free, PID 25f6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 108 114 116 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 298
Write 265
Mixed 111
SusWrite 115
246% 197 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
35% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 127%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 84 83 83 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 80.3
Write 79.1
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 83.7
104% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.6
214% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.9% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 28.1
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 26.3
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550 AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $719
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback