Today's hottest deals

Acer Extensa 215-21

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Extensa 215-21  (all builds)
MotherboardSR Bootes_SR
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200515
Uptime16.6 Days
Run DateJan 02 '22 at 12:16
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-9120e RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
21% Poor
Memory 38.2
1-Core 40
2-Core 51
28% 43.1 Pts
4-Core 22.4
8-Core 42
4% 32.2 Pts
64-Core 18.2
1% 18.2 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Acer(1025 1362) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.22
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
1.59% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 2.5
1% 2.57 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 3.9
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.59%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 262 193 192 205 209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60% Good
Read 401
Write 408
Mixed 383
SusWrite 224
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 23
80% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 119
89% 120 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 60%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 8GB
1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 6.3
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 211
19% 211 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 215-21 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 215-21

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback