Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '22 at 16:14
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 121
2-Core 220
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 724
68% 566 Pts
64-Core 956
59% 956 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$225
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.6% Good
Lighting 86.2
Reflection 89
Parallax 80
70% 85.1 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 76.6
Splatting 69.7
68% 85.8 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful SL300 1 120GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 111 123 112 83 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 300
Write 120
Mixed 150
SusWrite 102
37% 168 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 11
54% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 20.1
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 15.4
36% 68.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
312GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 170 174 174 173 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 118
Write 120
Mixed 49
SusWrite 171
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2E3200C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 34.4
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 29.2
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 133% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback