Today's hottest deals

Intel S5000VSA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics7.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel S5000VSA  (all builds)
Memory29.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080314
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateDec 31 '21 at 13:10
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.73GHz
CPU1, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26% Poor
Memory 31.7
1-Core 33.6
2-Core 66.7
26% 44 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 156
17% 133 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000
HP(103C 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
7.38% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 10.7
7% 9.8 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 9.6
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.38%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SDEZS25-240G-Z01 240GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EF870400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 78 68 129 102 113 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.1% Below average
Read 228
Write 211
Mixed 177
SusWrite 113
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 14.1
42% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 96.3
DQ Write 72.9
DQ Mixed 32.6
38% 67.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 245
16% 245 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S5000VSA Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel S5000VSA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback