Today's hottest deals

Asus M2N-X Plus

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 10%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M2N-X Plus  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20071023
Uptime18.3 Days
Run DateDec 30 '21 at 20:45
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+
AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Memory 41.9
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 1.9
20% 22.9 Pts
4-Core 4.3
8-Core 5.2
1% 4.75 Pts
64-Core 7.1
0% 7.1 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 340.52
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.39% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 0.8
1% 2.17 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.39%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CP10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 8.6 10 5.7 9 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 58.4
Write 64.2
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 12.5
33% 44.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 0
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 2.9
7% 2.43 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N-X Plus Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Asus M2N-X Plus

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback