Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '21 at 20:49
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$166
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 84.4
1-Core 169
2-Core 338
105% 197 Pts
4-Core 672
8-Core 1,161
111% 916 Pts
64-Core 1,576
98% 1,576 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 535 Series 120GB-$75
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RG21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 160 153 163 138 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 404
Write 177
Mixed 229
SusWrite 156
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 36
141% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 110
100% 151 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST9250410AS 250GB-$42
232GB free
Firmware: D005SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 94 95 90 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 99
Write 88.5
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 94.5
60% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C18D4/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 28.9
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 44.1
SC Mixed 31.9
99% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 1,237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $545
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback