Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime3 Days
Run DateDec 23 '21 at 21:17
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 86.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 289
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 1,068
99% 824 Pts
64-Core 1023
63% 1023 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 25.9
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 36.2
21% 30 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 28.8
Splatting 20
20% 25.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$98
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 266 222 259 262 259 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 2,410
Write 1,400
Mixed 1,174
SusWrite 287
291% 1,318 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 52.5
182% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 980
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 270
272% 464 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 195%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
585GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 420 392 421 397 378 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 421
Mixed 446
SusWrite 401
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 39.9
138% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 224
172% 242 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 133%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$68
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 7 18 16 30 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 104%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
227GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 105 97 102 104 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 124
Write 128
Mixed 99
SusWrite 102
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB-$70
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.6% Good
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 19.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.5
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,920 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $799
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback