Today's hottest deals

MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics92% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A32
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)  (all builds)
Memory58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '21 at 17:28
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 80%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 70.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 202
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 620
61% 499 Pts
64-Core 834
52% 834 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 103
Parallax 110
96% 110 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 98.4
Splatting 89.8
85% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$62
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B3T8EA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,204
Write 1,682
Mixed 1,460
395% 1,782 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 64.8
215% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 670
DQ Write 462
DQ Mixed 564
421% 565 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 311%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
580GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 204 207 205 203 203 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 133
Write 134
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 202
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
106% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4R.16FE 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 27.9
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 26.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 1,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $627
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback