PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 39.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 24.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX (all builds) |
Memory | 12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131002 |
Uptime | 1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 16 '21 at 18:23 |
Run Duration | 165 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
57.8%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.4%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 199 212 210 190 57 MB/s
|
24.9%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 24 24 25 25 MB/s
|
13.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
927GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 180 184 186 186 186 MB/s
|
99.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF CT102464BA160B.C16 16GB
333, 333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
40.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 84x |
FX-4300AMD $52Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 26x |
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 13x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $233 |