Today's hottest deals

Medion D3F3-EM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion D3F3-EM  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION D3F3-EM
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 12 '21 at 03:10
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 49.8
1-Core 62.8
2-Core 107
43% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 168
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
PwrHis(1787 2020) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.3% Average
Lighting 60.3
Reflection 67.1
Parallax 77.5
49% 68.3 fps
MRender 58.2
Gravity 54.4
Splatting 41.1
41% 51.2 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 50%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 96 63 147 134 134 MB/s
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.4% Average
Read 266
Write 148
Mixed 141
SusWrite 118
37% 168 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 20.7
85% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 91.8
DQ Mixed 33.3
50% 95.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.3% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 14.2
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical D3F3-EM Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Medion D3F3-EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback