Today's hottest deals

Philco 14M2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 7%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPhilco 14M2  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook 14M2
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '21 at 01:30
Run Duration471 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-2100 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
15% Very poor
Memory 26.9
1-Core 13.7
2-Core 20.4
14% 20.3 Pts
4-Core 18
8-Core 23.7
3% 20.9 Pts
64-Core 22.5
1% 22.5 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15%
Great: 26%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8210
Clevo(1558 4512) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.18% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 3
2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.18%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 71 60 0.7 2 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 14.5
Write 64.5
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 44.4
26% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 17%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
3.41% Terrible
MC Read 0.2
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 0.7
2% 0.87 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 0.1
2% 0.77 GB/s
Latency 274
15% 274 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback