Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory16.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 10 '21 at 04:06
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$380
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 88.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 286
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 996
93% 773 Pts
64-Core 1,506
93% 1,506 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
Asus(1043 8728) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 149
Parallax 150
123% 150 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 138
Splatting 117
118% 149 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 923 478 312 293 471 475 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 2,579
Write 1,488
Mixed 1,749
SusWrite 492
350% 1,577 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 64.8
214% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 407
DQ Mixed 499
420% 627 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 231%
Great: 372%
WDC WD181KRYZ-01AGBB0 18TB
76GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 154 169 183 146 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 110
Write 115
Mixed 108
SusWrite 150
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 0.1
34% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 4.2
DQ Mixed 3.6
2% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 39%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 15 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 36.1
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 14.4
21% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 0.7
259% 3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 103%
StoreJet Transcend 8TB
5TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 32.6
Write 33.9
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 13.6
38% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 0.9
301% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32%
Great: 92%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 20TB
4.5TB free, PID 25f6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 35.9
Write 36
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 13.2
39% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
146% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 141%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M4C3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 13.4
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 18.6
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 7,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $844
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback