Today's hottest deals

MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C08
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190904
Uptime24.4 Days
Run DateDec 09 '21 at 17:10
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 89.3
1-Core 84
2-Core 249
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 715
76% 606 Pts
64-Core 710
44% 710 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.1% Above average
Lighting 74.6
Reflection 77.3
Parallax 74.1
61% 75.3 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 74.2
Splatting 58.8
53% 65.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ldlc F6+M.2 480 480GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0918A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 345 18 164 6.2 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 459
Write 6
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 92
30% 142 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 0.2
58% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFRA266.C8FJ 04CD F4-2666C19-8GIS 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 24.3
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 25.4
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08) Builds (Compare 4,073 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 139% - Outstanding Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback