Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision WorkStation 690

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation 690  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0MY171
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '21 at 16:00
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5355
Microprocessor, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 35.1
2-Core 69.8
37% 56.1 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 279
25% 210 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
6.04% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 6.7
6% 7.77 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 7.1
6% 8.13 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.04%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 512GB 512GB
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201219
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 224 223 189 230 232 MB/s
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.3% Above average
Read 254
Write 234
Mixed 223
SusWrite 221
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 14.1
91% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 19.8
55% 117 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 211%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
231GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 59 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 61.8
Write 58.3
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 58.2
40% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.9% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 4.4
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation 690 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision WorkStation 690

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback